#midgard

Did you guys make any special decisions we should be aware of?

@adrenalin mRFC 42 was a major deal... other than that we discussed Mono, Midgard's relation with Tracker and GObject Introspection which would give us JS, Perl, Java and other bindings.

@bergie: I like the idea. I am at the moment pondering on Ragnaroek based website about how to nicely simulate sitegroups while still using only one. It does touch the subject, albeit only slightly.

This could perhaps be a solution for creating systems alike with staging/live, but having three stages rather than two: staging, live and archive.

@adrenalin I wonder why would you want to simulate sitegroups (as in the strict separation, including read privileges, of everything) and still not use them ? I guess you will want to rephrase that.

If you're planning something like TKK has where there is gazillion sites, each with their own content managers, but everyone can read (by default) everything and for example news and calendars can have symlinked content from any site etc. But this is nothing like sitegroups which are very strict separation.

@rambo: Yes, basically it's what you guys have at TKK. Too little of caffeine and sleep last night, too bad for my articulation. :-)