Lisbeth Klastrup: Users are Useless – Some Reflections by a Social Media Researcher
posted to #someme 24.08.2010 (en)
Hey you all, I created a seminar reference list in Somus Etherpad where we can list the readings: http://somus.etherpad.vtt.fi/166
Lisbeth Klastrup:
* Ethnographic research method: Going native - you can't research without being out there...
* Pay & give attention to the whole wide diversity of users - Danish Election 2007 online research project: >90% of users only visited sites, being passive
--> The most comments we received by the most popular politicians - e.g. four blog posts / thousands of comments; usual topics were like sleeping, being tired -> we want you to win etc.
-> seems that currently social media is not a way for a newbie, unknown politician to become popular
ConnectIrmeli commented on posted to #someme 31.08.2010 (en)
Master's Thesis research on elderly Danish women's use of Facebook -> calls them "whisperers" - they are extremely active through mail function; not sharing anything publicly
ConnectIrmeli commented on posted to #someme 31.08.2010 (en)
There was a problem with the slides. They should work now. Sorry.
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/1714470/somem...
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/1714470/someme/klastrup-so...
A sidenote, in the train this morning I listened to a podcast by BBC from New Orleans. It was about the oil leak and how young people feel about it - and they said that the FB is really an important tool especially for two reasons: to show emotions (empathy for the local people among others) and to find out how to act on behalf of the nature and the local people effected by the oil.
Still surprised at the finding 25% of Wikipedia users are also creating content? And 9% are active creators. Could a structured & information oriented media possibly become more democratic / representative?
matildasmeds commented on posted to #someme 31.08.2010 (en)
About the Wikipedia survey, the astonishingly high percentage of contributors is counted from the population of "active-users", not from the "general audience". In the latter case, the percentage would probably be significantly smaller. The authors themselves wrote to their preliminary results : "Since it is impossible to quantify the universe of people using Wikipedia and how many of them are contributors it will be hard to evaluate whether the shares we found in our survey are representative."
Copyright Rohea Oy 2010 | Mobile version | Feedback | API | Terms of Service | Applications and tools